Scientific research has often relied on available financial resources, but the approach to obtaining the necessary funding has changed throughout history. This article describes common sources of funding, the results of these sources of funding, and new ways to develop revenue streams through NFTs to support the research of medical device development.
Currently, the two major sources of scientific research are the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). According to the National Science Foundation’s website, its budget was listed on $ 8.5 billion in 2021 and is funding “27% of the total federal budget for basic research conducted at US universities.” The National Science Foundation also offers about 12,000 awards annually, and projects usually run for three years. According to the NIH website, 55,038 applications were submitted in 2020, 11,332 were approved, with a success rate of only 21%.
The competitive nature of financing has multiple consequences. Historically, scientists have been backed by private funders such as Galileo with the support of the Pope and wealthy citizens. Nowadays, many scientists can receive sponsored grants. For example, pharmaceutical companies subsidize pharmaceutical research. However, this can lead to bias in the findings.
Funding will help further scientific research during medical device research, but to reduce motivation for replication, reconfigure research modes to meet expectations, and earn sufficient income to conduct research. It also has some negative effects, such as hindering creativity. The combined impact of the competitive nature of obtaining grants, along with the impact of encouraging specific research, raises questions, what options exist?
In recent years, NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) have had a major impact on the market, including several major markets such as OpenSea, CryptoPunks / Larva Labs and Axie Infinity. NFTs are digital assets that can be used to claim to own a digital entity. While many major NFT marketplaces have served primarily art rather than science, universities are beginning to jump into the trend by using NFTs to fund scientific research. In particular, the University of California, Berkeley uses Nobel Prize-winning research. This includes Jim Allison’s fourth pillar, which focuses on cancer immunotherapy, and Jennifer Doudna’s work on gene editing technology (CRISPR-Cas9). Research at the university. According to Bitcoinist, universities using NFTs to fund research “have a decentralized organization or structure that funds critical development research without prioritizing the interests of third parties. You can create it. “
However, the success of NFTs in the science and technology of medical devices also requires community support that can be used to help scientific projects reach their full potential. This may require an expert assessment and community assessment system in the field of science and technology. These measures can also benefit from recommendations and forecasts, along with the science and technology IP market.
With market changes and ongoing competition for funding, it is becoming increasingly important to find supportive communities to develop new means of financing and foster scientific research. To achieve this, it is also necessary to accept new forms of income that exist outside of traditional grant applications.
For more information on your work and how to get community support for mint science NFTs, please visit https://grmds.org/.
